upcoming releases

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

upcoming releases

paulk_asert
Hi,

I am planning to merge PR#508 and start the release process for 2.4.10
over the next few days. This contains an important bug fix that
affects downstream projects such as Grails. Any other fixes people
want in that release?

Soon after that is released I am planning to create a 2_5_X branch and
begin preparation of a 2.5.0 release. If our review/rework of macros
is complete by then it will be a beta-1 release. If not, it will be an
alpha-1 release with an appropriate warning in the release notes about
subject to change etc. While it is important to get macros correct, I
fear that having a release is probably the only way to get enough
eyeballs/attention to catch any unforeseen impacts of that change.

Any thoughts?

Cheers, Paul.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upcoming releases

jwagenleitner
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Paul King <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I am planning to merge PR#508 and start the release process for 2.4.10
over the next few days. This contains an important bug fix that
affects downstream projects such as Grails. Any other fixes people
want in that release?

Soon after that is released I am planning to create a 2_5_X branch and
begin preparation of a 2.5.0 release. If our review/rework of macros
is complete by then it will be a beta-1 release. If not, it will be an
alpha-1 release with an appropriate warning in the release notes about
subject to change etc. While it is important to get macros correct, I
fear that having a release is probably the only way to get enough
eyeballs/attention to catch any unforeseen impacts of that change.

Any thoughts?


I agree, I think it would be good to get a 2.5 alpha/beta out soon to get more eyes on macros and the many other changes not in 2.4.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upcoming releases

paulk_asert
I have created the 2_5_X branch. I have made master 3.0.0(-SNAPSHOT)
for now. This doesn't stop us having a 2.6 stream if we need it. Which
I suspect we do but will cover that in another email.

Just a reminder that for now any bugs fixes might need to be
cherry-picked unto both the 2_5_X and 2_4_X branches. I will create
additional CI jobs on teamcity over the coming week.

Cheers, Paul.


On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:10 AM, John Wagenleitner
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Paul King <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to merge PR#508 and start the release process for 2.4.10
>> over the next few days. This contains an important bug fix that
>> affects downstream projects such as Grails. Any other fixes people
>> want in that release?
>>
>> Soon after that is released I am planning to create a 2_5_X branch and
>> begin preparation of a 2.5.0 release. If our review/rework of macros
>> is complete by then it will be a beta-1 release. If not, it will be an
>> alpha-1 release with an appropriate warning in the release notes about
>> subject to change etc. While it is important to get macros correct, I
>> fear that having a release is probably the only way to get enough
>> eyeballs/attention to catch any unforeseen impacts of that change.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>
> I agree, I think it would be good to get a 2.5 alpha/beta out soon to get
> more eyes on macros and the many other changes not in 2.4.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upcoming releases

paulk_asert
Just a slight deviation to below. The version number on master has
temporarily been set to 2.9.98-SNAPSHOT pending Spock support of
Groovy 3+ version numbers.

Cheers, Paul.

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Paul King <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I have created the 2_5_X branch. I have made master 3.0.0(-SNAPSHOT)
> for now. This doesn't stop us having a 2.6 stream if we need it. Which
> I suspect we do but will cover that in another email.
>
> Just a reminder that for now any bugs fixes might need to be
> cherry-picked unto both the 2_5_X and 2_4_X branches. I will create
> additional CI jobs on teamcity over the coming week.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:10 AM, John Wagenleitner
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Paul King <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am planning to merge PR#508 and start the release process for 2.4.10
>>> over the next few days. This contains an important bug fix that
>>> affects downstream projects such as Grails. Any other fixes people
>>> want in that release?
>>>
>>> Soon after that is released I am planning to create a 2_5_X branch and
>>> begin preparation of a 2.5.0 release. If our review/rework of macros
>>> is complete by then it will be a beta-1 release. If not, it will be an
>>> alpha-1 release with an appropriate warning in the release notes about
>>> subject to change etc. While it is important to get macros correct, I
>>> fear that having a release is probably the only way to get enough
>>> eyeballs/attention to catch any unforeseen impacts of that change.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> I agree, I think it would be good to get a 2.5 alpha/beta out soon to get
>> more eyes on macros and the many other changes not in 2.4.
>>