Synthetic GroovyObject methods

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Synthetic GroovyObject methods

Jochen Theodorou
agreed

Am 12.03.2018 um 13:07 schrieb Paul King:

> I think we probably have to. It's an integration point that we haven't
> really seen a lot of call for in the past but with @CompileStatic
> becoming more popular, I can see more use of this style of integration.
>
> Keen to hear if anyone can see an ongoing problem if we remove it. Do we
> know of any other tools which might be relying on that aspect?
>
> Paul.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Daniel.Sun <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Jochen,
>
>           Should we remove ACC_SYNTHETIC?
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Sent from:
>     http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>     <http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Synthetic GroovyObject methods

Daniel.Sun
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Synthetic GroovyObject methods

Daniel Sun
12